CEASE AND DESIST AN UNWANTED COMPANION

THE HISTORY: This story did not start in 2026, 2025 or even in 2014, This story started with my father Nicholas de Vere back in 1993, Nicholas started researching genealogy for Margaret O'Shiel Parry and found that she was connected to the Ten High Kings of Ireland, Dad knew we also shared similar connections through his mums line the Butchers, As they Lived with and worked for Queen Victoria, Now the Queen would not have kept our family in court has they of not been instrumental for her. The reason being my great grandfather was a very high ranking officer in the army, with his assistance in the Battle of Waterloo and his help saving Ethel Grimwood. But we knew our family had further ties to the Royal family through My other grandfather James Weir and on the otherside The Hopgood/ Collison links ( Which I have now been found after 30 years) 

Nicholas started the Royal Dragon Court in 1993.

Nicholas wrote The Sechnaill Kings in 1995, Which was put under a NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT at that exact time, I remember it very well, The day my dad gave me that very manuscript and I held onto it for 30 years as per HIS WISHES. But why?

At the time in the late 1990's Nicholas de Vere started working with Laurence Gardner, all of his work was to be used in a series of books that Laurence and Nicholas were writing together, EQUALLY to be both known as the Authors with each taking merit, They became very good friends, Laurence would come over to my nans house for lunches, drinks and chats. They were like two peas in a pod each one being the back bone of the other, jeering each other on as they were both in the same mindset. Dad always had Laurence's back. He stood by him.

Before DAVID ICKE started spreading misinformation he was a footballer and host on grandstand or some football commentary, His career stopped when he was 21 and had to find new ventures to make money from, He was always in the mainstream on Television, When that all stopped I would assume and it seems as if he was used to being famous and wanted to maintain this level of fame.

In The early 1990's He was on Terry Wogan claiming to be like JESUS and the son of god, or his words THE GOD HEAD, The audience laughed, We all did when we watched it, He was a laughing stock, deluded pretending to be a prophet. When all of his prophecies didn't happen, and he was shunned, he saw from what I can see now is that the story of the grail bloodline was becoming heavily used, The years before we had The Holy Blood The Holy grail books, doing very well becoming best sellers, wanting some of this same limelight ICKE decided he was going to get invold, so at the time Nicholas de vere and Laurence Gardner had written their books about the grail bloodline, so ICKE started attempts at debate, what could be seen today as a smear campaign, The remnants of it are still on ICKES website although it seems he has deleted the EVIDENCE.  Barry Gardner – David Icke-

YOU CAN GOOGLE THIS ALL ITS STILL ONLINE

DAVID ICKE STARTED THE REPTILIAN CONSPIRACY THEORY

From my own research, This is what I found out the other day, as i had sat with this and dismissed it for many years until it has gotten to the piont where I CANNOT IGNORE IT.

This is from my facebook post concerning Jason Brashears and David Icke: and NO i will not edit it, I said it, and I meant every word. and although I am not taking side and Jason annoys the Hell out of me, ( Our personalities totally clash) I have to admit that i think he is just and right for calling out david Icke, Its been a long time coming.

Good morning

Yesturday, my friend in France an occult expert sent me some information, Grip your bum cheeks and hold on to your panties, you may shart yourself

Okeydokey then, and this is hilarious.

The David Icke and Jason Breashears online Spat.

Jason Brashears shared the same publisher as me and due to the amount of misinformation he spreads and other issues became the nail in the coffin to why i left the book tree. I could not share the same publisher with man who had been convicted of abuse on women. It becomes a public health issue if a publisher supports this type of person ( There are regulations that real publishers have to uphold, The issue being that if someone has such sensational ideas that they could cause harm to others for feeding them their mindset, this adds to ideologies on terrorism and such like extremist behaviours) feeding him public domain books while spending 30 years in prison and now he's out, he adds a few spins on those books and claims he authored them. Same as my old publisher, No originality.

There are many skits done on Jason that debunk him in under 3 mins and some hilarious ones.

Now Jason decided he wanted to debate some key issues with David Icke saying that David was basically full of plop ( he's not wrong) and actually the list i thought was credible list of topics.

So over to David Ickes channel where he gloats of 36 years of research, telling people he tells us the truth and if we don't believe it we should go and research it ourselves and how EVIL Jason is for calling him out, aswell as calling Jason out. Both of them spread misinformation. They are both very similar, clout chasers desperate for fame, money, grifters.

So while David is doing his victim act of how misinformation being spread causes hate, trolling etc etc boo hoo.

I call David out and said hang on a minute david, Its because of your lies and misinformation that people are calling my brand, my community and bloodline Reptilians. This has been going in for over 30 years, daily i get stalked, trolled, people doing podcasts, idiots writing books, spreading the same lies and misinformation you started, all coz you had a spat with Laurence Gardner and Nicholas de Vere (yep, im balls deep in this )

I get the fantasists who have spent their lives listening to Icke, twisting what he said along with twisting what my dad said as a joke. I get genuine people who are fans of our work also being confused by this level of dads satire, Laurence and Tracy Twyman's click bait clout and Icke's alien monsters. Its become a fuckeradary swamp, at this stage you may aswell add an imp and a sashquatch lol or and this is how bad fringe theory has gotten, The Nephalim looked like clowns ( get me a straight jacket and zip me up, here's Jonny)

The other day i said that i thought icke spent the previous few years before his Terry Wogan Interview on LSD, I was not fully wrong.

So WHERE OH WHERE did icke get his information from?
Where did this concept of reptilian beings come from? This amazing ground breaking info that Icke has spent decades cultivating?

Icke has described his ideas as evolving over time. In his own words, he had a spiritual experience in the early 90s, which he says opened him to these ideas. After that, he pulled from a bunch of sources—some fringe archaeology, ancient astronaut theories, and, yes, even some sci-fi inspiration. It’s a mix of speculative interpretations and his own attempts to connect dots.

The Fictional Blueprint: He took the "shape-shifting serpent men ruling human kingdoms" concept straight out of Robert E. Howard’s 1929 pulp fiction (The Shadow Kingdom).

The Science-Fiction Mashup: He blended that with Zecharia Sitchin’s fictionalized, highly criticized interpretations of Sumerian space-gods.

The Shamanic Weaponization: He then flew to South Africa, interviewed Credo Mutwa, and took Mutwa's profound, sacred visions—experienced through authentic indigenous psychedelic trancing—and weaponized them as "proof" to validate his stolen sci-fi script.
LETS add a little bit of Ancient Aliens in here because this is where it belongs by the 1960s and '70s, authors like Erich von Däniken, in his 1968 book "Chariots of the Gods?," proposed that ancient human civilizations were influenced or even engineered by extraterrestrials. These ideas drew on interpretations of ancient monuments, texts, and art—claiming, for example, that the pyramids or other wonders were evidence of alien contact.

He has NO BACKED UP EVIDENCE to any of his claims, his evidence comes from other authors who's idea's and theories have never been accepted as credible. 

Sitchin’s ideas were heavily criticized by actual historians and linguists because his translations didn’t hold up. So what do we takeaway from this? Just because something sounds ancient or mysterious doesn’t mean it’s true. When people cherry-pick history or science to fit a narrative, we’ve got to ask: What’s the evidence, and who’s actually backing it up?

Just to add an extra layer of how these claim then turned into shapeshifting reptilian and recent videos that are surfacing on the internet of people saying they are trying to remove SHAPESHIFTING Werewolves from history:
The 15th-century werewolf trials or similar accounts were documenting beliefs about people who thought they could transform—often under the influence of superstition or religious fears. No one back then was talking about literal shape-shifting creatures in the sci-fi sense. They were capturing cultural fears and allegories of the time—often related to mental states or accusations of witchcraft. So, historical accounts of shape-shifting were really reflections of social anxieties, not proof of lizard overlords! They were investigating MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES.
It is a masterclass in alternative media laundering. They take creative fiction, mix it with stolen, miscontextualised shamanic or genealogical traditions, and sell it to a terrified audience as a "cosmic secret." Knowing that his audience already took scripture from the bible as literal, along with properganda the church twisted, He played the same game and used it as a mechanism to fool people who were already easily fooled, already baked into spoon fed conspiracy and used it against them to make money from them, all the while telling them not to believe everything they read and see, telling them to research it themselves, and in his own words saying, its not my fault if they dont research it and do the work, his deception in his eyes has been the most honest deception.

But in my eyes its still deception, manufactured misinformation that has lead me to being a victim of the lies he spread 30 years ago, to the piont where i am have had to do damage control and now have had to write a cease and desist book to another one of his victims who unlike me, doesnt do the research.

So when i do the book launch, this will be added as its needs to be in the public to show people how lies can effect other people, not that I feel sorry for Gary Wayne, he is just as much to blame for his greed as the others and his clout chasing predecessors.

Poof the Evil witch is dead.

Am i evil for telling the truth and doing the work others failed to? Am i evil for making people aware that they have been lied to by the very person that tells everyone in his sensational claims, books, posts that they have been lied to.

This should be a lesson to everyone to as David says, never believe everything you see on the internet or read in some peoples books.

and the truth is, David Icke is responsible for the CULT OF STUPIDITY, He says Jason's followers aren't very intelligent, everything he says about Jason (not that i take either side) is projection and is exactly how i see him, This is the ULTIMATE DICK JOUSTING AT DAWN, and I would have thought that David would had learnt his lessons from the shit show he started 30 years ago,
( He says he's spiritual and has higher awareness) but it seems he loves this low vibrational bullshit, fear mongering control from his bullshit factory that comes from a non fiction book.

The first book they published was the Guardian of the Grail Kings, The using the same information and formular from Nicholas de Vere's information which Gardner stated in this first book he could not have done it without the Dragon Archive and family information provided by Nicholas de Vere's, This is in The Acknowledgement pages in the book, They the used the Manuscript of The Sechnaill Kings along with more research by Nicholas de Vere which he wrote in a book that was originally called, MY KINGDOM IS NOT MY OWN, then he named it From Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells and later The Dragon Legacy, Laurence called his book, THE REALM OF THE RING LORDS again another best selling book. But this time LAURENCE PLAGERISED THE WORK OF NICHOLAS DE VERE, He did not credit him the way he did in the first book, Nicholas was distraught, How could his friend do this to him, Laurence decided he was also going to start his own DRAGON COURT and just swapped a few words around to make it look authentic and that he had started it originally, It got to the point where they were going to drag each other into court, Laurence claiming Libel and Nicholas claiming Plagerism, and as dad was never about the money, He just wanted his work to be published and to be credited. Laurence then made it look like he attributed Nick, But he didn't, he acknowledge his own version of his own Royal Dragon Court, We all saw it for what it was, still not taking accountability so Nick hit back and Published The DRAGON LEGACY in 2004, with the help from Paul Tice at The Book Tree and Tracy Twyman helping getting it into the mainstream, This battle went on for years, Laurence still telling lies and hiding behind the fact that Nicks work had made him a star in the literary world, Hiding behind clout chasing greed. ( This is why i cannot stand these types of people).

Because Michael La Frosse was found out to be a fraud, Nicholas got tarred with the same brush. Nick was name a fraud, also, This was so damaging to dad, He wrote the Dragon Cede to prove he knew exactly what he was talking about and laid out his one of his rants in the book about what happened between him and Laurence. THE ANGELA AND LAURENCE GRAVY TRAIN and the fact that they were only in it for the money, This disgusted dad as the books were about our family bloodline, The Vere's.

Now not even two years after dad had died Gary Wayne was writing a book about THE BIBLE and in his words on a podcast, He realised that his books would not do so well so he started looking into SECRET SOCIETIES, and specifically looking at The Royal Dragon Court and any other conspiracy theory he could find that seems to do well or be popular in the mainstream.

I saw from Gary Wayne's podcasts the old issue resurfacing, I purchased Gary's books on Kindle and looked at the work, On his podcasts he is framing the serpent bloodline as EVIL SATANIC, BLOOD DRINKERS and as he has gone on over 400 podcasts he has spread this misinformation to anyone who will have him on there, ( This level of desperation to get notice is unhinged)

In his first book, he cites Laurence Gardner 456 times for The Guardians of the Grail Kings and The Realm of the Ring Lords, When I know that work is my dads, That's a level of misattribution, In his second book he cites Nicholas de Vere over 56 times, I did not count how many he cited Gardner because it was already apparent to me that any citation he did use was actually going to be dads, when looking at the work, in his second book, Gary Wayne Cite firstly HIMSELF, in his first books and then cites Gardner, Nothing for the fact he has used the same work time and time again which is in THE DRAGON LEGACY. In one chapter the ELVEN HOUSE OF VERE , he has basically cited Nicholas de Vere over 17 times, This overall IS NOT FAIR USE. No permission was granted and will not be granted for the substantial amount of work reused in Gary Wayne's books..

Why is this an issue?

What Gary Wayne has done and  what I show in my book is heavily being reliant on The work of Nicholas de Vere for his book, He has taken the frame work, Chapters word and reshaped it into a defamation biblical book judging us for our bloodline and calling us EVIL, this is not good will, You cannot use someone's work to defame them and make money from it at the same time.

I wrote to Gary Wayne's publisher who clearly has not read Wayne's books, they did not pass it through the correct scrutiny processes or they would have seen the level of misuse which is very apparent to me, the trained eye. and The person who has been the steward to the literary estate of Nicholas de Vere for the last 13 to 17 years , Bill Carmichael from Riverside Books claimed that Wayne had ONLY CITED ONCE, this was not true, He asked for a side by side comparison and when given it to him, he went QUIET, NOTHING, NO RESPONSE, They both know fully well what they are doing, they are aware of the issues with Gardner and that The Realm of the Ring Lord is The Dragon Legacy. With more podcasts lined up and Gary Wayne not stopping in promotion and making money from my estate they are now knowingly infringing my work.

Cease and Desist, An unwanted companion is a book about my fathers and my own struggles when dealing with Plagiarism, greed, clout chasers, pdf theft, Podcasters and the MANY OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAVE ATTEMPTED THEFT OF THE ROYAL DRAGON COURT.
It shows a side by side review and critique of Gary Wayne's Genesis 6 Conspiracy books where i only reproduce work he has lifted of us, So i cant infringe my own work now can I, It shows his misinterpretation of Nicholas de Vere's Satire and Iconoclastic  Theories, Along with how misinterpretation can be seen to be defamation. As he hides behind his books being a critique of our work, it only seems fair that I critique his work. It shows evidence of conversations with myself sending a cease and desist to his publisher and then how they are now knowingly committing defamation and copyright offences and other podcasters attempting to defame me with smear campaigns and online bullying, it shows how fair use and good will is not good will if you use someone's work against a person to persecute them and make money from it.

I show hypocrisy, double standards, The hiding behind a mask of god to attempt to elevate themselves above us while going against everything their religion warns about.

It discusses many people who I have asserted my rights on, including the Internet Archives, Some Major Bands via DMCA Take downs, in November I had over 30 PDFS removed from Google. I show exactly how people have used my dads work, this is why i produced the Sechnaill kings to prove the provenance of our work being published in 1995.
It shows Case law with real judgements within intellectual and copyright law, The regulations surrounding Public domain work and infringements due to the confusion layman misunderstand when someone has died and don't realise that our work is protected for 70 years after death. And now The Dragon Legacy, The Dragon Cede, The Sechnaill Kings, Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells and my own books will be fully protected until after my own death.
The Dragon Legacy is also protected under UK AND USA LAW, as it is currently registered in The USA Copyright Office along with being  held within the legal deposit scheme and currently have books at Cambridge University, The British Library, The Bodleian library
National Library of Scotland:, National Library of Wales:
Trinity College Library, Dublin.

This is why I have the Trademarks, Along with why I have reregistered The Sovereign Grand Duchy of Drakenberg in Exhile LTD to stop people selling fraudulent titles in my name, My fathers Name, To stop people setting my micro nations etc

This is not a retaliation, This is protection of My work and my fathers legacy, my inheritance which I have preserved and protected for 13 years. This book will be available on amazon and ALL GOOD BOOK STORES.

By using or basically copy and pasting the bible and cherry picking propaganda used by the church, The issue becomes that These people, all sit their on their Podcasts thinking Gary Wayne is the Authority on our work, He side lines is some of the podcasts that he heavily used the work of Nicholas de Vere and almost makes out that its his new research that he has done, ITS NOT, ITS 30 YEARS OLD RESEARCH by Nicholas de Vere.

On the many podcasts Wayne and his pals  use false allegations about real people in order to gain views for click bait, while monetising from these platforms.

 But The he twists the serpent bloodline to fit what the bible says about SATAN, Lucifer etc, When my book A Story of A Thousand Faces how people exactly how lies are distorted to present a truth to those who are gullible enough to accept it, its the same mechanism that ICKE used. The same the church has used for centuries, all the while these christian forget that their church is responsible for child trafficking, That they believe a religion that started with a man that took a child of 12 years old and married her, He was 3 times her age, their whole religion was based on paedophilier and still to this day is responsible for the worst crimes in humanity against children, you do not have to look far to find out recent investigation of child SA from the 1970's to 2015 by popes, priests etc.

In the bible JESUS SAYS:  Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves." (Matthew 7:15) 

 Jesus often challenged religious leaders of his time, especially when they were hypocritical or placed burdens on others. He emphasized the heart over rigid structures. For example, in Matthew 21, Jesus overturns tables in the temple, criticizing those who turned a house of prayer into a place of profit. He also says in Matthew 23 that leaders who love public displays of piety but neglect justice, mercy, and faith are missing the point. In short, Jesus’ teachings often remind people that true faith isn’t about institutions or titles, but about living with integrity, compassion, and humility. 

“You shall not steal” — relevant to my argument about taking or exploiting another person's intellectual work.

“You shall not bear false witness against your neighbour” — probably the strongest one for what I am discussing. If someone knowingly or recklessly makes false allegations about another person, Christianity itself expressly condemns false witness.

“You shall not covet” — relevant to my wider discussion of greed, status, money, audiences and benefiting from what belongs to somebody else.

And there is another one that fits my point extremely well: “You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God.” If somebody invokes God or Christianity to give moral authority to accusations, while behaving contrary to the principles they claim to represent, I can legitimately question that hypocrisy.

Jesus's own teaching in Matthew 7:1: “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” And Matthew 7:15 warns about false prophets. Those give you a very strong framework for saying: I am not judging their Christianity; I am comparing their behaviour with the standards contained in the religion they themselves invoke.

You cannot hide behind the Church and the mask of GOD while behaving in the way that Jesus your lord and saviour warned you against.

There is a reason I am becoming increasingly concerned about conspiracy theories, and it has nothing to do with wanting to stop people questioning governments, religion, history or powerful institutions. Question them. I do. The problem starts when questioning something turns into making allegations about real human beings without evidence, and those allegations are repeated so many times that people eventually forget they were allegations in the first place. This is exactly why I have become interested in dismantling conspiracy theories. 

Take Fritz Springmeier's Bloodlines of the Illuminati. Springmeier promoted the idea that thirteen supposedly Satanic bloodlines secretly control world affairs. Stop there for a minute and think about what is actually being alleged. Not simply that wealthy families possess disproportionate influence, not that inherited wealth exists, not that political connections exist or that powerful people sometimes behave corruptly. Those are things that can actually be investigated. Instead, entire families and bloodlines become characters in a gigantic supernatural conspiracy. Once somebody has accepted the original premise, almost anything can become evidence. They are wealthy? Illuminati. They are royal? Illuminati. There is a serpent in their heraldry? Satanic. There is a dragon? Reptilian. Their ancestors married another prominent family? Bloodline breeding programme. Somebody belongs to the same genealogy hundreds of years later? Apparently they are involved as well. This is not genealogy. This is storytelling using genealogy as a prop, and that distinction matters because bloodlines contain real people, children, grandchildren and thousands upon thousands of descendants who had absolutely nothing to do with whatever somebody on the internet has decided their medieval ancestor supposedly represented.

Once people believe that a secret group controls everything, the theory becomes almost impossible to disprove. If somebody denies belonging to it, they say of course they deny it because it is secret. If there is no evidence, they say the evidence has been removed. If a historian disagrees, the historian is controlled. If the media challenges it, the media is controlled. If the family themselves object, they are apparently trying to silence the truth. If somebody asks for evidence, they are told to do their own research. That is not research. That is a belief system designed so that nothing can falsify it. I have seen exactly how this works. One person makes a claim, another repeats it, a podcast discusses the second person's version, somebody writes an article about the podcast and then a YouTuber discovers all four and announces that they have found multiple sources. They haven't. They have found the same allegation travelling around in a circle. Eventually the original source disappears underneath thirty years of repetition, and misinformation launders itself into fact.

Then comes the moral superiority, and this is where I think it becomes genuinely dangerous. Once somebody convinces themselves that another group is Satanic, evil, demonic, reptilian, blood-drinking or secretly controlling humanity, they have created a moral hierarchy. We are the good people, they are the evil people. Once you do that, behaviour starts to change. Somebody who would normally understand that stalking another person is unacceptable can convince themselves that they are investigating. Somebody spreading allegations can tell themselves they are exposing evil. Somebody repeatedly contacting or targeting another person can believe they are performing a public service. Somebody making money from sensational allegations can tell themselves that they are merely exercising freedom of speech. The target stops being treated like an ordinary human being and becomes a character in the conspiracy instead. Everything they do then gets interpreted through that conspiracy, and this is exactly why dehumanising propaganda has always been dangerous.

I am not saying somebody writing a ridiculous conspiracy book automatically causes genocide. That would itself be ridiculous. What I am saying is that history repeatedly shows us what happens when populations are taught to see another group as fundamentally corrupt, dangerous, less human, contaminated by blood or secretly responsible for society's problems. Witch hunts did not begin because somebody walked into a village carrying proof of supernatural crimes. They grew through accusation, fear, religious judgement, repetition and the belief that supposedly evil people existed amongst everyone else. Antisemitic propaganda worked through the same basic mechanism of turning ordinary people into an imagined secret enemy. Nazi racial ideology then took obsession with ancestry, inherited characteristics and supposedly corrupt blood to its most horrific conclusion. That does not mean every modern bloodline conspiracy theorist is a Nazi, and I am not saying that. I am saying people should understand what they are playing with when they start attaching evil to ancestry and telling audiences that certain families are inherently dangerous.

That is particularly ridiculous when you understand genealogy. Go back far enough and family trees overlap constantly. Human populations migrated, mixed and married into neighbouring populations. Royal houses intermarried. Ordinary descendants spread throughout countries. One person living centuries ago can have huge numbers of descendants today. So when somebody becomes obsessed with condemning an ancient bloodline, they might want to have a look at their own genealogy before getting too excited, because there is every possibility they are condemning ancestry that they themselves also descend from. This is why my own work looks at genealogy, anthropology, migration and human ancestry together. Human history does not divide neatly into the little boxes that conspiracy theorists need it to.

This is also why misinformation surrounding the Royal Dragon Court matters to me. I have personally watched people take serpent symbolism, dragon symbolism, my father's satire and iconoclastic work, Laurence Gardner, biblical material, medieval propaganda, David Icke-style reptilian ideas, later conspiracy writers and completely unrelated pieces of history and put the entire thing into one enormous pot. Then suddenly we are apparently Satanic, reptilian, blood-drinking, shape-shifting or whatever else somebody has decided that week. Somebody repeats it, somebody else makes a podcast, another person writes a book and then another person discovers those books and podcasts and assumes all of them constitute independent evidence. They don't. This is exactly why I constantly go back to provenance. Where did the claim originate? Who actually said it? What did they mean? Was the material history, religion, folklore, propaganda, satire, fiction or somebody's interpretation? You cannot take all of those completely different things, strip away the context and then pretend they all prove the same supernatural story.

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism either. People are entitled to disagree with me. They are entitled to say they do not like my books or that they think one of my historical interpretations is wrong. They are entitled to criticise the Royal Dragon Court. What they are not entitled to expect is that I will remain silent while allegations about real people are spread around the internet and monetised. If somebody says that we are literally a blood-drinking cult, that is not the same thing as saying they dislike our symbolism. If somebody says that I disagree with their interpretation of serpent symbolism, that is criticism. If somebody makes a factual allegation that identifiable human beings engage in disturbing conduct, that is something completely different, and calling it freedom of expression does not magically erase the consequences of making the allegation.

The internet has made all of this far worse because fear and sensationalism make money. Thirty years ago some ridiculous claim might have disappeared into an obscure book. Now it can be turned into hundreds of videos, podcasts, posts and reaction channels. The more frightening the headline is, the more people click it. "Secret Satanic Bloodline Exposed" is going to get more attention than "I spent six months checking medieval land records and discovered this was actually rather complicated." Unfortunately real history usually is complicated. Sometimes there is no Satanic cabal. Sometimes there is a deed. Sometimes there is a marriage contract. Sometimes there is political propaganda. Sometimes somebody misunderstood a religious text. Sometimes somebody exaggerated. Sometimes somebody took satire literally. Sometimes somebody simply made something up. That is why provenance matters more than how exciting the claim sounds.

And dismantling conspiracy theories does not mean blindly believing authority either. Governments can lie. Churches have produced propaganda. Corporations can behave appallingly. Historians can make mistakes. Scientists can disagree. Publishers can publish rubbish. Journalists can get stories wrong. Questioning authority is healthy, but proper scepticism has to work both ways. If you demand evidence from the government, demand evidence from the conspiracy theorist. If you question a historian's sources, question the YouTuber's sources as well. Nobody gets a free pass simply because they call themselves an alternative researcher. "Do your own research" does not mean find somebody on the internet who already agrees with you. It means go backwards, find the original source, check the date, check the author, check the translation, check whether it was fact, folklore, propaganda, religion, satire or fiction and then ask whether the evidence actually supports the conclusion being made.

That is why I will continue dismantling this material. Not because I want people to stop questioning things, but because I want people to question things properly. Behind every so-called bloodline is a human being. Behind every surname is a family. Behind every photograph is a real person. When thousands of strangers are told that those people are evil, Satanic, reptilian, blood-drinking or secretly responsible for the problems of the world, some of those strangers are eventually going to behave accordingly. That is where conspiracy theory stops being harmless entertainment. It might be entertainment to the person watching it and money to the person selling it, but to the person who has been turned into one of its characters, the consequences can be very real.

If you watch something on a podcast, DO NOT TAKE IT AS GOSPEL, Christ do not take the bible as literal, thats how all of this started, Research what these people say to you, RESEARCH WHAT I SAY, Research the conspiracy, find out if it was a hoax, find out THE TRUTH before you become another person who spread lies and hatred.

THE PEOPLE WHO ARE TELLING YOU THAT YOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO ARE ACTUALLY THE ONES LYING TO YOU, its gotten that bad.

Dad said the last thing we need or want is a religious group in our name, and what do we have, loads of spiritual pathway groups, People thinking they are Aliens, People saying they are the descendant of ISHTA, it gets to a point when i have to question everyone's mental health before i even commit to speaking to them or having to do background check to see if they have gone to jail, , then i question their motivation for wanting contact with me, ITS TOO MUCH, CHECK YOURSELVES.

The people i do associate myself with are of sound mind and are amazing intelligent people, we are a wonderful family of people who love genealogy and history, Do not try to destroy that.

I have had people try to shut me down, tell me They don't like that I am calling people out, But I will do what I like to stop this sort of behaviour as it has become like a virus and its a virus i never signed up for, I knew that I would have to do damage control because of dads hilarious humour and unfortunately this is not new , this was how my father was treated, But with 10 books under my belt, and wonderful people who support me, I will not stop doing what I am doing. I love helping people on their journey, They tell me all the time ,that my work benefits and inspires them, This is our legacy and only we can preserve it for our family and future generations, we will not be put down or persecuted any longer for being remarkable people who lead and inspire others to be the best version of themselves.

My upcoming books will continue to be published, My info videos will be published, My voice will not be silenced. My work stands for itself, We are on a completely different playing field, They are Pseudo story tellers, where my work is evidence law, and historically backed up  and not by other pseudo historians and armchair researchers.

Toodles, Abbe de Vere