Abbe de Vere is a professional genealogist, historian, and author whose work focuses on tracing British bloodlines, analysing population structure, and continuing the documented archival legacy of the Royal Dragon Court founded by her father, Nicholas de Vere. Her research integrates genealogy, peerage law, DNA studies, anthropology, and historical linguistics, providing a comprehensive and academically grounded approach to Britain’s noble and royal lineage patterns.
Following Nicholas de Vere’s passing in 2013, she assumed responsibility for the Royal Dragon Court’s archival preservation and publishing work, including Dragon Publishing and the curation of historical manuscripts. Her scholarship emphasises evidential integrity, the use of primary sources such as charters, heraldic records, and parish documents, and the clarification of historical misunderstandings regarding aristocratic lineage.
Her major publication, The Royal Dragon Court: Inbred Britain, presents a rigorous examination of how dynastic strategy, marriage alliances, legal inheritance, and endogamy shaped Britain’s aristocracy. Drawing upon genetic data and peer-reviewed population studies, the book demonstrates how “inbreeding” functioned as a historical mechanism for preserving titles, estates, and political stability—not the sensationalist meaning often associated with the term today.
Abbe de Vere’s additional editorial work, such as restoring From Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells and other manuscripts by Nicholas de Vere, ensures that his early linguistic and genealogical analyses remain accessible within their correct academic context. Her research bridges mythological symbolism with verifiable historical evidence, highlighting how royal and noble families used symbolic language—such as the Dragon motif—to express identity, continuity, and sovereignty.
Today, as custodian of the Royal Dragon Court, she maintains its focus on documented lineage research, historical accuracy, and genealogical verification. Her work is recognised for combining academic rigour with public accessibility, offering readers meaningful insights into ancestry, heritage, and the cultural evolution of Britain’s ruling families.
Note from Abbe de Vere
My first book as an author is presented as part of the Royal Dragon Court Legacy, the works begun by my father, Nicholas de Vere. This is the third book to be published under the Royal Dragon Court name, and the first new release in twelve years since my father’s passing in 2013. For over a decade, I have worked to keep his vision alive, most actively since 2018, by continuing to promote his writings while developing my own. Inbred Britain is the first step in that journey, and it marks both a continuation of his legacy and the beginning of my own.
the royal dragon court inbred britain
Inbred Britain takes the reader deep into the questions of ancestry, kinship, and identity in these islands. It is not a sensationalist book to use the word “inbred,” but a serious exploration of what that word actually means when we examine the historical and anthropological record. Rather than treating inbreeding as an insult or curiosity, this work places it into its proper historical, social, and biological context. In doing so, it uncovers truths about how dynasties, noble houses, and ordinary communities really functioned.
The book begins with the foundations of anthropology and the settlement of Britain: the tribal migrations, the cultural exchanges, and the genetic mixing that laid the groundwork for later history. From there, it traces how families, both great and small, organised themselves. In the ruling classes, cousin marriage was a deliberate tool, used to keep land, titles, and influence within a closed circle. In villages and parishes, the same pattern appeared for different reasons: limited mobility, small populations, and the social bonds of faith or occupation. Both realities shaped the nation in profound ways.
Genealogy provides the map, while modern DNA research adds an extra layer of clarity. The book explains pedigree collapse—the way a single ancestor can appear many times in one’s tree—and shows how this reality means that all of us, whether descended from peasants or peers, are far more closely related than we tend to imagine. By examining case studies, family charts, and specific marriages, the book demonstrates that the story of “inbreeding” in Britain is not one of shame or anomaly, but the ordinary, universal pattern of how families and societies were built.
At the same time, the book does not shy away from the consequences of close-kin marriage. It looks at where health issues arose, when dynasties weakened themselves, and how biology interacts with culture and politics. But it also offers a corrective to exaggeration: most families, most of the time, found ways to balance closeness and diversity, and the survival of Britain’s population itself is proof of resilience.
Inbred Britain is constructed upon a rigorously curated body of evidence. The work is heavily cited throughout, drawing upon an extensive range of primary sources including medieval and early-modern charters, parliamentary and manorial records, peerage documents, parish registers, and heraldic visitations. These are supplemented by modern scientific data, notably genetic studies and population-level DNA research. The narrative is further supported by peer-reviewed publications from established anthropologists, historians, and geneticists, selected for their methodological soundness and their relevance to the genealogical and population-structure questions addressed in this volume.
It is therefore important to state explicitly that this research bears no resemblance to the speculative or unscientific narratives advanced by contemporary conspiracy writers such as David Icke. Any superficial association is entirely misplaced. Inbred Britain is grounded in archival documentation, population genetics, and academically verifiable analysis, and it deliberately corrects the distortions later projected onto Nicholas de Vere’s work by those who replaced historical and biological realities with alien or supernatural interpretations.
Although Abbe de Vere explores historical genealogies, mythological motifs, and medieval cultural traditions, her work is not “alternative history.” It is an evidence-based analysis supported by archival documents, peer-reviewed genetics, anthropological research, and literary history. References to Tolkien’s use of Gaelic kingship traditions or to dynastic links between the de Clare family and the Ten High Kings of Ireland are grounded in documented sources, not speculative or fringe theories. Her scholarship belongs firmly within mainstream historical, genealogical, and cultural studies.
The breadth and quality of these citations serve a dual purpose: they advance the research itself, and they systematically pre-empt and dismantle attempts to dismiss or undermine the author’s conclusions. The cumulative weight of evidence — from archival manuscripts to contemporary scientific literature — demonstrates that the work of Abbe de Vere stands firmly within a documented, academically verifiable framework. Assertions are not merely stated; they are traceable, sourced, and defensible.
The Royal Dragon Court Inbred Britain continues and strengthens the foundation of Nicholas de Vere’s work, particularly in the areas where his original texts lacked extensive citations. Much of his material was later co-opted by groups who attempted to monetise sensationalist interpretations — most notoriously the claim that the Anunnaki were extraterrestrial beings. This is a misreading of de Vere’s own position. His use of the term hybrid human referred not to aliens, but to the blending of distinct hominin lineages within early Homo sapiens.
Modern genetics now confirms what de Vere was pointing toward: all human populations are the product of admixture events. Interbreeding between early Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, Denisovans, and other archaic humans, combined with repeated waves of migration, founder effects, and population bottlenecks, collectively shaped the species we know today. We are hybrid by definition.
Claims of “pure bloodlines” collapse under even basic scrutiny.
Among scholars and geneticists, purebred is understood to mean inbred — a closed population with minimal genetic inflow. No modern human is genetically “pure.” If they were, they would resemble isolated hunter-gatherer communities who have remained bottlenecked for millennia. Even these communities are not “unevolved”; they are fully modern Homo sapiens, possessing lineages that are ancient, but not primitive.
Every human alive carries layers of mixed ancestry representing tens of thousands of years of interwoven clans, migrations, and cultural exchanges. Purity is a myth; hybridity is reality.
The Royal Dragon Court , Inbred Britain is written to be accessible to the reader who wants to understand without being overwhelmed by extensive historical facts. It is a book that invites the reader to think critically, to test stories against evidence, and to see their own ancestry in a new light.
Ultimately, this is a book about connection. It shows that the story of Britain is not the story of separate classes, tribes, or dynasties, but one great web in which all our lives are entangled. By peeling away myth and distortion, Inbred Britain asks the reader to recognise that history is not a distant abstraction—it is the shared inheritance written in our families, our records, and our very blood.
The Royal Dragon Court Inbred Britain is available at all good bookstores WORLDWIDE.
Amazon in Korea, Japan, Germany, Italy, Austrailia, Denmark, New Zealand., South Africa, the Netherlands.
You can find my books at Waterstones,Hatchards, Foyles, Saxo in Denamrk, Fishpond NZ, Picflic in France, Feltrinelli Italy
There are a few dodgy listings on ebay that have bumped up the price, so make sure you dont buy from them, but at the same time, thanks for the free advertising lol. Note that in my discriptions my third person quotations are purely for seo reasons, That google picks up the correct wording as it wont know who the I am that I speak about , You know its still all me, bold, brash and authenticly genuine.
The Royal Dragon Court Inbred Britain by Abbe de Vere has been produced to meet scholarly expectations, with full citations, documentary sources, and methodological transparency appropriate for academic review. Institutions, researchers, and university libraries wishing to obtain copies of The Royal Dragon Court: Inbred Britain for teaching, archival, or reference purposes are encouraged to reach out for acquisition enquiries or further dialogue.
A Story of A Thousand Faces in PROGRESS NOW
A Story of A Thousand Faces is a book that explores how truths have been distorted for the benefit of the narrative — whether that be fear, control, or money. Across centuries, myths and histories have been reshaped to suit the needs of those in power, while the same stories are retold again and again, only with new masks, new names, and new characters.
This book takes the reader through familiar tales of gods, kings, saints, angels, dragons, and devils, showing how these figures shift in meaning over time. A benevolent guardian may be turned into a tyrant; a story of love and sacrifice may become a warning of sin and punishment. What appears to be many different myths is, in truth, the same archetypal story repeated across cultures, retold to influence belief and behaviour.
By drawing together literature, folklore, chronicles, and myth, A Story of A Thousand Faces reveals how authority has used storytelling as a tool of control, and how the same themes echo through our collective imagination. It invites the reader to recognise the repetition, to question what has been presented as truth, and to see through the masks that disguise the original stories.
This is not a work of fantasy. It is a work about truth — about reclaiming the ability to read critically, to question the authorised version, and to see how much of what we are told is not new at all, but simply another retelling of A Story of A Thousand Faces.
Dragon Spiracy exists partly as satire and partly as a line in the sand.
It was created as a deliberate piss-take of the growing number of AI-fuelled content gold-diggers who regurgitate my father’s work and present it as their own. While some historical material sits in the public domain, language, structure, interpretation, and narrative fingerprints do not. When I hear my father’s exact wording, his phrases, his framing, and even his interview language repeated verbatim, it is painfully obvious where it came from.
I also see people using my father’s crest, setting up TikTok and Instagram accounts under The Royal Dragon Court, and presenting themselves as though they are part of something they have neither inherited nor evidenced.
So let’s be absolutely clear.
Before my father’s death, the work operated under the Imperial and Royal Dragon Court (IRDC) and the Sovereign and Grand Duchy of Drakenberg, both under his name and his copyright. This is entirely separate from the medieval Order of the Dragon (Order Draconis, 1408) associated with Sigismund of Luxembourg. No one owns an extinct medieval order or its emblem, and no one can claim exclusive rights over that symbolism.
What can be protected is modern intellectual property: authored interpretation, original structure, continued bodies of work, and derivative misuse.
When my father died in 2013, I inherited his intellectual estate. I continued the work, renamed it The Royal Dragon Court, and formally reinstated the Sovereign Grand Duchy of Drakenberg as a limited company under my name. Under UK inheritance and copyright law, all associated projects and continuations are legally mine.
This includes:
The Royal Dragon Court-Dragon Publishing -Devere Farm- Dragon Spiracy-
House of Vere- Prince or Princess de Vere Von Drakenberg- Anything to do with Drakenberg
The Sovereign Grand Duchy of Drakenberg.
As an author, both my work and my father’s are protected internationally under the Berne Convention.
The Royal Dragon Court and all Material is further protected under TRADEMARK LAW.
Yes — my father did use the term Draconian, and this is where much of the confusion began.
When he used it, he was not founding a belief system, creating a spiritual identity, or referencing modern internet mythology. He used Draconian ambiguously and descriptively, as shorthand within a historical context, referring to lineage associated with the medieval Order of the Dragon and the discipline, exclusivity, and continuity of noble inheritance. It was never intended as doctrine, spirituality, or self-identification.
At the time, there was no TikTok culture, no AI content scraping, and no monetised “Draconian spirituality.” His audience understood the historical context. That context has since been stripped away.
My father explicitly warned against people forming new religions, cults, or belief systems from this material. Those who now misuse the term Draconian to justify spiritual paths, RH-negative mysticism, priesthoods, or personal status are doing precisely what he cautioned against.
For that reason, I no longer use the term in that way and actively correct its misuse. Any modern framing of Draconian as a spiritual identity or belief system is a misrepresentation of the original work.
Dragon Spiracy exists to expose how absurd the online ecosystem has become — inflated followers, paid bots, recycled scripts, and people speaking in pseudo-medieval word salad while claiming authority. The irony is that the more this happens, the clearer the provenance becomes. People search Dragon Bloodline or Royal Dragon Court, and every road leads back here.
If they buy the books along the way, great. If not, the record still stands.
Where it stops being funny is when people attempt to publish books, courses, or “orders” based on this material while seeking my validation. If your work is not factual, not evidenced, not cited properly, and not capable of standing up to academic scrutiny, it will not be validated by me. Rewriting my father’s material and padding it with fantasy does not make you an author — it dilutes the work and misleads readers.
Every Dragon Spiracy video is scripted by me. I organise the visuals, music, and narrative myself. They exist to strip away fantasy, correct errors, and present evidence-based context — not to entertain delusion.
If you wish to reference our work:
If your book was generated by AI, padded with conjecture, or framed as spirituality, it will not be endorsed. I am not telling anyone what they may or may not believe — I am telling you to leave our names out of it.
I am not being difficult.
I am protecting an inheritance.
I am protecting decades of work.
And I am setting a precedent.
Dragon Spiracy is not an attack.
It is a correction — delivered with humour, clarity, and authority.
You can purchase signed books,The Royal Dragon Court Inbred Britain by Abbe de Vere and Transylvania To Tunbridge Wells by Nicholas De Vere on our shop THE ROYAL DRAGON COURT BOOKS page, Grab your copy HERE