Abbe De vere author of the royal dragon court inbred britain

Abbe de Vere is a professional genealogist, historian, and author whose work focuses on tracing British bloodlines, analysing population structure, and continuing the documented archival legacy of the Royal Dragon Court founded by her father, Nicholas de Vere. Her research integrates genealogy, peerage law, DNA studies, anthropology, and historical linguistics, providing a comprehensive and academically grounded approach to Britain’s noble and royal lineage patterns.

Following Nicholas de Vere’s passing in 2013, she assumed responsibility for the Royal Dragon Court’s archival preservation and publishing work, including Dragon Publishing and the curation of historical manuscripts. Her scholarship emphasises evidential integrity, the use of primary sources such as charters, heraldic records, and parish documents, and the clarification of historical misunderstandings regarding aristocratic lineage.

Her major publication, The Royal Dragon Court: Inbred Britain, presents a rigorous examination of how dynastic strategy, marriage alliances, legal inheritance, and endogamy shaped Britain’s aristocracy. Drawing upon genetic data and peer-reviewed population studies, the book demonstrates how “inbreeding” functioned as a historical mechanism for preserving titles, estates, and political stability—not the sensationalist meaning often associated with the term today.

Abbe de Vere’s additional editorial work, such as restoring From Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells and other manuscripts by Nicholas de Vere, ensures that his early linguistic and genealogical analyses remain accessible within their correct academic context. Her research bridges mythological symbolism with verifiable historical evidence, highlighting how royal and noble families used symbolic language—such as the Dragon motif—to express identity, continuity, and sovereignty.

Today, as custodian of the Royal Dragon Court, she maintains its focus on documented lineage research, historical accuracy, and genealogical verification. Her work is recognised for combining academic rigour with public accessibility, offering readers meaningful insights into ancestry, heritage, and the cultural evolution of Britain’s ruling families.

Note from Abbe de Vere

My first book as an author is presented as part of the Royal Dragon Court Legacy, the works begun by my father, Nicholas de Vere. This is the third book to be published under the Royal Dragon Court name, and the first new release in twelve years since my father’s passing in 2013. For over a decade, I have worked to keep his vision alive, most actively since 2018, by continuing to promote his writings while developing my own. Inbred Britain is the first step in that journey, and it marks both a continuation of his legacy and the beginning of my own.

the royal dragon court inbred britain

 Inbred Britain takes the reader deep into the questions of ancestry, kinship, and identity in these islands. It is not a sensationalist book to use the word “inbred,” but a serious exploration of what that word actually means when we examine the historical and anthropological record. Rather than treating inbreeding as an insult or curiosity, this work places it into its proper historical, social, and biological context. In doing so, it uncovers truths about how dynasties, noble houses, and ordinary communities really functioned.

The book begins with the foundations of anthropology and the settlement of Britain: the tribal migrations, the cultural exchanges, and the genetic mixing that laid the groundwork for later history. From there, it traces how families, both great and small, organised themselves. In the ruling classes, cousin marriage was a deliberate tool, used to keep land, titles, and influence within a closed circle. In villages and parishes, the same pattern appeared for different reasons: limited mobility, small populations, and the social bonds of faith or occupation. Both realities shaped the nation in profound ways.

Genealogy provides the map, while modern DNA research adds an extra layer of clarity. The book explains pedigree collapse—the way a single ancestor can appear many times in one’s tree—and shows how this reality means that all of us, whether descended from peasants or peers, are far more closely related than we tend to imagine. By examining case studies, family charts, and specific marriages, the book demonstrates that the story of “inbreeding” in Britain is not one of shame or anomaly, but the ordinary, universal pattern of how families and societies were built.

At the same time, the book does not shy away from the consequences of close-kin marriage. It looks at where health issues arose, when dynasties weakened themselves, and how biology interacts with culture and politics. But it also offers a corrective to exaggeration: most families, most of the time, found ways to balance closeness and diversity, and the survival of Britain’s population itself is proof of resilience.

Inbred Britain is constructed upon a rigorously curated body of evidence. The work is heavily cited throughout, drawing upon an extensive range of primary sources including medieval and early-modern charters, parliamentary and manorial records, peerage documents, parish registers, and heraldic visitations. These are supplemented by modern scientific data, notably genetic studies and population-level DNA research. The narrative is further supported by peer-reviewed publications from established anthropologists, historians, and geneticists, selected for their methodological soundness and their relevance to the genealogical and population-structure questions addressed in this volume.

It is therefore important to state explicitly that this research bears no resemblance to the speculative or unscientific narratives advanced by contemporary conspiracy writers such as David Icke. Any superficial association is entirely misplaced. Inbred Britain is grounded in archival documentation, population genetics, and academically verifiable analysis, and it deliberately corrects the distortions later projected onto Nicholas de Vere’s work by those who replaced historical and biological realities with alien or supernatural interpretations.  

Although Abbe de Vere explores historical genealogies, mythological motifs, and medieval cultural traditions, her work is not “alternative history.” It is an evidence-based analysis supported by archival documents, peer-reviewed genetics, anthropological research, and literary history. References to Tolkien’s use of Gaelic kingship traditions or to dynastic links between the de Clare family and the Ten High Kings of Ireland are grounded in documented sources, not speculative or fringe theories. Her scholarship belongs firmly within mainstream historical, genealogical, and cultural studies. 

The breadth and quality of these citations serve a dual purpose: they advance the research itself, and they systematically pre-empt and dismantle attempts to dismiss or undermine the author’s conclusions. The cumulative weight of evidence — from archival manuscripts to contemporary scientific literature — demonstrates that the work of Abbe de Vere stands firmly within a documented, academically verifiable framework. Assertions are not merely stated; they are traceable, sourced, and defensible.

The Royal Dragon Court Inbred Britain continues and strengthens the foundation of Nicholas de Vere’s work, particularly in the areas where his original texts lacked extensive citations. Much of his material was later co-opted by groups who attempted to monetise sensationalist interpretations — most notoriously the claim that the Anunnaki were extraterrestrial beings. This is a misreading of de Vere’s own position. His use of the term hybrid human referred not to aliens, but to the blending of distinct hominin lineages within early Homo sapiens.

Modern genetics now confirms what de Vere was pointing toward: all human populations are the product of admixture events. Interbreeding between early Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, Denisovans, and other archaic humans, combined with repeated waves of migration, founder effects, and population bottlenecks, collectively shaped the species we know today. We are hybrid by definition.

Claims of “pure bloodlines” collapse under even basic scrutiny.
Among scholars and geneticists, purebred is understood to mean inbred — a closed population with minimal genetic inflow. No modern human is genetically “pure.” If they were, they would resemble isolated hunter-gatherer communities who have remained bottlenecked for millennia. Even these communities are not “unevolved”; they are fully modern Homo sapiens, possessing lineages that are ancient, but not primitive.

Every human alive carries layers of mixed ancestry representing tens of thousands of years of interwoven clans, migrations, and cultural exchanges. Purity is a myth; hybridity is reality.

The Royal Dragon Court , Inbred Britain is written to be accessible to the reader who wants to understand without being overwhelmed by extensive historical facts. It is a book that invites the reader to think critically, to test stories against evidence, and to see their own ancestry in a new light.

Ultimately, this is a book about connection. It shows that the story of Britain is not the story of separate classes, tribes, or dynasties, but one great web in which all our lives are entangled. By peeling away myth and distortion, Inbred Britain asks the reader to recognise that history is not a distant abstraction—it is the shared inheritance written in our families, our records, and our very blood.

The Royal Dragon Court Inbred Britain is available at all good bookstores WORLDWIDE. 

Amazon in Korea, Japan, Germany, Italy, Austrailia, Denmark, New Zealand., South Africa, the Netherlands.

You can find my books at Waterstones,Hatchards, Foyles,  Saxo in Denamrk,  Fishpond NZ, Picflic in France, Feltrinelli Italy

There are a few dodgy listings on ebay that have bumped up the price, so make sure you dont buy from them, but at the same time, thanks for the free advertising lol. Note that in my discriptions my third person quotations are purely for seo reasons, That google picks up the correct wording as it wont know who the I am that I speak about , You know its still all me, bold, brash and authenticly genuine.

 The Royal Dragon Court Inbred Britain by Abbe de Vere has been produced to meet scholarly expectations, with full citations, documentary sources, and methodological transparency appropriate for academic review. Institutions, researchers, and university libraries wishing to obtain copies of The Royal Dragon Court: Inbred Britain for teaching, archival, or reference purposes are encouraged to reach out for acquisition enquiries or further dialogue. 

A Story of A Thousand Faces in PROGRESS NOW

A Story of A Thousand Faces is a book that explores how truths have been distorted for the benefit of the narrative — whether that be fear, control, or money. Across centuries, myths and histories have been reshaped to suit the needs of those in power, while the same stories are retold again and again, only with new masks, new names, and new characters.

This book takes the reader through familiar tales of gods, kings, saints, angels, dragons, and devils, showing how these figures shift in meaning over time. A benevolent guardian may be turned into a tyrant; a story of love and sacrifice may become a warning of sin and punishment. What appears to be many different myths is, in truth, the same archetypal story repeated across cultures, retold to influence belief and behaviour.

By drawing together literature, folklore, chronicles, and myth, A Story of A Thousand Faces reveals how authority has used storytelling as a tool of control, and how the same themes echo through our collective imagination. It invites the reader to recognise the repetition, to question what has been presented as truth, and to see through the masks that disguise the original stories.

This is not a work of fantasy. It is a work about truth — about reclaiming the ability to read critically, to question the authorised version, and to see how much of what we are told is not new at all, but simply another retelling of A Story of A Thousand Faces.

 Dragon Spiracy brace yourselves for an ABBE RANT

I have set up Dragon Spiracy as a kind of piss take on all of the AI GOLD DIGGERS who keep reguritating my dads work and making out its their own, now, I understand that some of the work is in the public domain, but the way its spoken, written, his word its clear that they got this information from The Dragon Legacy, dads interview videos, etc, I also see lots of people using my fathers crest as their own, or setting up instagram and tiktok using the name the Royal Dragon Court,  I  wanted to get this straight, Before dad died he called it the IRDC, THE IMPERIAL AND ROYAL DRAGON COURT, or The Sovereign and Grand Duchy of Drakenberg, This was under dads name and under his copyright which is different to Sigismond of Luxemberg called it ORDER DRACONIS, however you cannot claim copyright to an ancient and extinct order or emblem from 1408, so nobody owns that and we all use it to show that it is related to the same ancestral tree ( That is if those people can prove this with certified DNA and lineage, otherwise you are just using it for the sake of looking like you are part of something that you are not.

When dad died, I took over the Imperial and Royal Dragon Court and renamed it to just The Royal Dragon Court, I also took over The Sovereign Grand Duchy Of Drakenberg, which I have reinstated as a limited company under my name, The Royal Dragon Court comes under this company, along with anything else I wish to create in the name of my father. So that being Devere Farm, Dragon Publishing, The Royal Dragon Court, Dragon Spiracy are all now legally mine under UK LAW of Inheritance SINCE 2013 and therefore copyright law.

As I am now an author the Berne Convention now covers all of my work worldwide. At the same time as I see and hear this ploppy plop, which dilutes mine and my fathers work, I decided to set up Dragon Spiracy to ensure that facts and truth about our belief and knowledge is laid bare for all to see and that anyone who does attempt to use our work must eventually realise that people will google, dragon bloodline, royal dragon court and it will all lead back to me, and they will then come here and see that the original work was started by us. If they end up buying our books, thats great, So its kind of an oxymoron really, if anyone else starts writing books as us, then they are breaking the law, and as I have absolutely no issue the doing DNC take down as This was my job since 2009 when dads was alive, its kinds my job and thing I do, along with having a degreee in copywrite law. So im seeing this all as a big laugh really. Plus on the up side some have put in a lot of leg work for me to get this out there, so cheers for that then.

 I was going to do a video of Fiona from shrek discussing rh negative blood coz if you go on TIKTOK thats what you will find, many experts with nothing in between their ears, all claiming they are of the blood and when one guy commented and asked if she had proof, which honestly that the first thing that came into my head, how does she know- she said to him, I dont need proof, I know I am, SO SHE HAS NO dna NO ancestry and is spurting out crap like shes the goddess of RH-, lol and there's so many like her, click baiters, wannabes, pick me types, all dishing out their toxic behaviour to anyone who does not stand by them and agree with them. This is the internet unfortunately, people become over familiar with you and feel they need to tell you stuff you already know, then think that if they speak in a middle english verse, word salad, that usually each word is carefully selected crap, all starting their spiritual path orders, Like lol the high prestesses of draconian or some crap, there are all hating on eachother right now because some girl has paid alot of money to get known and they hate her, witch hunt her because they are jealous that they don't get the same following, I absolutey pissed myself, They are all arguing over spritual path they think they started because they read my dads books but got the words wrong and used draconian which is wrong, In amoungst their word salads they mess everything up, its like making a hot chocolate fudge cake with diarreah. Draconian come from Draconian law, he was an ancient greek dude who used to write laws so harsh, he wrote them in blood. Draconian is far way apart from what Dragons are, So that was funny, and the fact that they aren't that spiritual if they are all hating on eachother-JUST BECAUSE IT HAS DRACO IN IT DOES NOT MAKE IT THE DRAGON BLOODLINE WAY.

I feel i need to explain this further as there are a resounding amount of dimwitted people, When my father refered to "Draconian" he was using this term ambiguously to describe those of the bloodline, people who have the certified DNA and ancestry evidence to back it up. I must ensure that if you had read my fathers books, you would have seen that he clearly stated that he thinks that there would be nothing worst than people making up new religions due to the dragon court order, The imperial and royal dragon court the sovereign grand duchy of drakenberg or anything that he discusses, So those of you that have done this for monetary gains have bascially done the exact opposite of what my father wanted. So to look in our direction for validation again will never happen.The minute i see these words, i know that you have twisted up the wrong information and are splurting it out for your own benefit.

Just using these words shows me that its my fathers work and inpiration that you have started these little gangs, (I  call them gary glitter gang gangs, and we all know what happened there ) lol start round table meetings hahah

In all of the video under DRAGON SPIRACY, I write the scripts myself, organise the music and visuals to tell the truth on all matters misunderstood, seriously theres so many missing laughing cry my eyes out emojis here. It isnt that easy and is painstaking to get these videos out, But they all tell you about my Dad, Nicholas De Vere and my continued dedication to his and my work, I have tried to right wrongs, give evidence and stop fluff and fantasy. The other issues is people writing books and looking to me for validation, If the books are not fact, have no decent citations, bibliography and possibly have no chance to stand up as academic research then I definately do not and will not validate them at all, most likely you incorrectly percieved the information that was presented and made the rest up as you went along, Thats not writing from source, its rewriting my dads material and then making it into fiction, Again DILUTES OUR WORK. If I get asked again by any new age authors I will direct you here to this page and then you will understand that you are part of the problem, I wish you all the best of luck if people actually buy this dribble, but there is no way im helping you towards this goal. It's like your mum dying and her writing books and me taking those books apart that you inherited and then me making loads of money from it, there is no moral boundry, no integrity and not my thing, I wouldnt do it to others so why is ok to do it to me? SO if in future I tell you your books is so good its like hot chocolate fudge cake, i wish you to see this, coz the fudge cake is poop and im just being nice so i can back away into the bushes like Homer Simpson hahahaha.

Formally, if you are going to use our work in future, ask yourself whether your work would be regarded as academic?, would universities consider using it as a basis for education? 

All work is to be aksed for permission beforehand from myself as the copyright owner, cited correctly using either my of my fathers name, date of publishing, title of the books and chapter used., If and lord know's why I am helping here, but if you use chicago style citations and a bibliography, I may consider doing it a review, if it is anything other than rigorously and well researched information, using science , anthropology, history, and along the same lines as my book inbred britain, than it will not ever be considered, If you have used AI to pump out a book then you are not really an author. Now i must make this clear, i am in no way judging others, you do you, but just leave our names out of plop, There is absolutely a clear difference in the work we produce. I am not being an arse, I am protecting my inheritance, the intellectual property owned by myself and my father and setting a precident for how we expect it to be used in the future, if it is continued to be diluted it will not be taken seriously and will forever remain under the tin foil hat club, With all honesty the work I have produced alone suppliments my fathers work, giving it the academic background and evidence it deserved in the first place.